Real Property

High-Yield Subject. Real Property appears frequently on both the essay and MBE portions of the California Bar Exam. Expect crossover with Community Property, Wills & Succession, Remedies, and Constitutional Law (takings). A single essay can weave together estates, future interests, landlord-tenant, easements, covenants, recording acts, and mortgages—so you must know all subtopics cold.

Real Property law governs the rights, interests, and obligations relating to land and things attached to it. For the California Bar Exam, you must master both the common-law rules tested on the MBE and the California-specific statutory modifications tested on the essay portion. This guide covers every major subtopic in the depth needed for full-credit answers.

California Distinction—Overview. California has abolished several common-law doctrines (e.g., the destructibility of contingent remainders, the Rule in Shelley's Case, the Doctrine of Worthier Title). California also follows a race-notice recording statute (Cal. Civ. Code §1214) and recognizes an implied warranty of habitability by statute (Cal. Civ. Code §1941–1942.5). Always state the common-law rule first, then pivot to the California rule.

I. Estates in Land

An estate is a possessory interest in land measured by some period of time. Estates are classified by their duration and the conditions attached to them.

A. Freehold Estates

1. Fee Simple Absolute

2. Defeasible Fees

A fee simple that may be cut short upon the occurrence (or non-occurrence) of a specified condition. There are three types:

Type Language Future Interest How It Ends
Fee Simple Determinable "To A so long as," "while," "during," "until" Possibility of reverter (grantor) Automatically upon occurrence of the stated event
Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent "To A, but if… grantor may re-enter," "on condition that," "provided that" Right of entry / power of termination (grantor) Only when the grantor exercises the right of entry
Fee Simple Subject to Executory Limitation "To A, but if… then to B" Executory interest (third party) Automatically divests upon the stated event, passing to third party
Rule—Construction Preference. Courts disfavor forfeiture. When language is ambiguous, courts prefer: (1) fee simple absolute over defeasible fee; (2) fee simple subject to condition subsequent over fee simple determinable (because FSSCS requires affirmative action to reclaim, giving the holder more protection).
CA Distinction—Defeasible Fees. Under Cal. Civ. Code §885.010–885.070, possibilities of reverter and rights of entry (called "powers of termination") are subject to a 30-year marketable-title statute. If the holder of the future interest does not record a notice of intent to preserve the interest within 30 years after the interest was created, the interest expires. This effectively limits the duration of defeasible fees in California.

3. Life Estate

CA Distinction—Life Estates. California allows life tenants to commit ameliorative waste where the alteration increases the property's value and the property's current use is unreasonable given changed neighborhood conditions. Cal. Civ. Code §818 presumes a fee simple rather than a life estate when the instrument is ambiguous.

B. Non-Freehold (Leasehold) Estates

Type Duration Creation Termination
Tenancy for Years Fixed, definite period (days, months, years) Agreement (writing required if >1 year under SOF) Automatically at end of term; no notice required
Periodic Tenancy Recurring period (month-to-month, year-to-year) Express agreement, implication (e.g., rent paid monthly), or holdover Notice required: common law = at least equal to the period (max 6 months for year-to-year); CA = 30 days for month-to-month, 60 days if tenant occupied >1 year
Tenancy at Will No fixed period; lasts as long as both parties desire Express agreement or implication Either party may terminate at any time; reasonable notice required
Tenancy at Sufferance Holdover tenant wrongfully remaining Tenant stays after lease expires Landlord either evicts or binds tenant to a new periodic tenancy
CA Distinction—Termination of Periodic Tenancy. Under Cal. Civ. Code §1946.1, a landlord of residential property must give 30 days' notice for month-to-month tenancies, or 60 days' notice if the tenant has resided in the unit for one year or more. The California Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (AB 1482) adds statewide "just cause" eviction protections and rent caps for many residential tenancies.

II. Future Interests

Exam Strategy. Future interests are a perennial MBE favorite. Always classify the present estate first, then identify what future interest follows. Use a systematic approach: (1) Who holds the future interest—grantor or third party? (2) Is it vested or contingent? (3) Does the Rule Against Perpetuities apply?

A. Future Interests in the Grantor

B. Future Interests in Third Parties (Transferees)

1. Remainders

A remainder is a future interest created in a third party that is capable of becoming possessory upon the natural expiration of the prior estate. A remainder never divests a prior estate.

Type Definition Example RAP?
Vested Remainder Created in an ascertained person with no condition precedent (other than the natural termination of the prior estate) "To A for life, then to B." B has a vested remainder. Indefeasibly vested: No
Vested Remainder Subject to Open (VRSO) Vested in at least one member of a class, but the class may increase "To A for life, then to A's children." If A has one child (B), B has a VRSO. Yes (class gift rule)
Vested Remainder Subject to Total Divestment Vested but may be entirely divested by a condition subsequent "To A for life, then to B, but if B fails to graduate, then to C." The divesting condition (executory interest) is subject to RAP
Contingent Remainder Created in an unascertained person OR subject to a condition precedent "To A for life, then to B if B graduates from law school." Yes
Rule—Destructibility of Contingent Remainders. At common law, a contingent remainder was destroyed if it failed to vest by the time the preceding estate ended. California has abolished this rule. If the contingent remainder has not vested when the life estate ends, the grantor (or grantor's heirs) take a reversion subject to the remainder's springing executory interest.

2. Executory Interests

C. The Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP)

Classic RAP: No interest is valid unless it must vest, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in being at the creation of the interest. If there is any possibility, no matter how remote, that the interest might vest beyond the perpetuities period, it is void ab initio.

Applies to: Contingent remainders, executory interests, vested remainders subject to open (class gifts), options to purchase (held by non-tenants).

Does NOT apply to: Reversions, possibilities of reverter, rights of entry, vested remainders (indefeasibly vested or subject to total divestment—only the divesting executory interest is tested).

RAP Analysis Steps

  1. Classify the interest. Is it subject to RAP?
  2. Identify the condition precedent that must be satisfied for the interest to vest.
  3. Find a validating life—a person alive at the creation of the interest who will necessarily determine whether the condition is met within 21 years of that person's death.
  4. If no validating life exists, the interest violates RAP and is void.
Classic RAP Traps (Click to Expand)
  • The Unborn Widow: "To A for life, then to A's widow for life, then to A's children then living." A's "widow" is unascertained and might be someone not yet born. The gift to A's children violates RAP.
  • The Fertile Octogenarian: Under classic RAP, every living person is conclusively presumed capable of having children, regardless of age. So "To A for life, then to A's children who reach 25" can violate RAP if A might have a new child who won't reach 25 within 21 years of any life in being.
  • The Slothful Executor: "To A when A's estate is settled." Estate administration could theoretically take more than 21 years. Interest is void.
  • Class Gifts—"All or Nothing" Rule: If the gift to any member of the class could vest too remotely, the entire class gift fails (unless saved by the rule of convenience, which closes the class when any member is entitled to distribution).
CA Distinction—Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities. California adopted the Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (USRAP) under Cal. Prob. Code §21200–21231. Under USRAP:
(1) An interest is valid if it satisfies the common-law RAP or
(2) It actually vests or terminates within 90 years of creation (a "wait and see" period).
(3) If it does not vest within 90 years, a court may reform (cy pres) the interest to carry out the transferor's intent within the allowable period.
California also abolished the presumption of fertility for persons over 65 (Cal. Prob. Code §21225) and the conclusive presumption that adoption is impossible.
Exam Warning. On the MBE, apply the common-law RAP (no wait-and-see). On the California essay, state the common-law rule, then apply California's USRAP with the 90-year wait-and-see period and cy pres reformation. Always address both.

III. Concurrent Estates

A. Tenancy in Common

B. Joint Tenancy

Mnemonic: T-TIPTime, Title, Interest, Possession — the four unities required for a joint tenancy.

Severance of Joint Tenancy

Any joint tenant may unilaterally sever the joint tenancy, converting it into a tenancy in common (destroying the right of survivorship). Severance methods:

CA Distinction—Joint Tenancy. California allows a person to create a joint tenancy with themselves by directly conveying "to A and B as joint tenants" without the need for a straw person (Cal. Civ. Code §683). This eliminates the common-law requirement of using an intermediary. California also expressly provides that a lease by one joint tenant does not sever the joint tenancy (Tenhet v. Boswell, 18 Cal.3d 150 (1976)).

C. Tenancy by the Entirety

D. Rights and Obligations of Co-Tenants

IV. Landlord-Tenant Law

A. Landlord's Duties

1. Duty to Deliver Possession

2. Implied Warranty of Habitability (IWH)

Rule: In residential leases, the landlord impliedly warrants that the premises are fit for human habitation and will remain so throughout the tenancy. The standard is typically the local housing code. This warranty cannot be waived.

Tenant's Remedies for Breach of IWH:

CA Distinction—Implied Warranty of Habitability. Cal. Civ. Code §1941–1942.5 codifies the IWH for residential property. The landlord must maintain the premises in a condition fit for human occupancy including adequate weatherproofing, plumbing, heating, electricity, sanitation, and working locks. Under Cal. Civ. Code §1942, after notice and a reasonable time for repair (30 days presumed), the tenant may repair and deduct up to one month's rent (limited to twice in any 12-month period). The tenant also may not be subjected to retaliatory eviction within 180 days of exercising these rights (Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5).

3. Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment

Constructive Eviction

Elements of Constructive Eviction (SING):
Substantial interference with tenant's use and enjoyment
It is caused by the landlord's actions or failure to act
Notice to the landlord and reasonable time to cure
Goodbye — tenant must vacate within a reasonable time
Mnemonic: SING for constructive eviction — Substantial interference, It's the landlord's fault, Notice given, Goodbye (tenant vacates).

B. Tenant's Duties

C. Assignment vs. Sublease

Feature Assignment Sublease
Definition Transfer of the tenant's entire remaining interest in the lease Transfer of less than the entire remaining term (retaining a reversion)
Privity of Estate with Landlord Yes — assignee steps into privity of estate with landlord No — sublessee has no privity of estate with the original landlord
Privity of Contract with Landlord No (unless assignee expressly assumes the lease) No
Original Tenant Liability Remains liable on privity of contract (unless landlord releases / novation) Remains liable on privity of contract and privity of estate
Landlord's Consent If the lease requires consent, the landlord may not unreasonably withhold consent (modern rule and California). A clause prohibiting assignment is strictly construed and does not bar subleasing (and vice versa).
CA Distinction—Assignment & Sublease. Cal. Civ. Code §1995.260 provides that where a lease includes a restriction on transfer, the landlord's consent may not be unreasonably withheld (for commercial leases, unless the lease expressly permits the landlord to withhold consent in its sole discretion). For residential leases, Cal. Civ. Code §1995.230 implies a reasonableness requirement.

D. Holdover Tenants

E. Abandonment

CA Distinction—Duty to Mitigate. California requires the landlord to make reasonable efforts to mitigate damages when a tenant abandons (Cal. Civ. Code §1951.2). The landlord cannot simply let the unit sit empty and sue for the full remaining rent.

F. Retaliatory Eviction

CA Distinction—Retaliatory Eviction. Under Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5, a landlord may not retaliate against a tenant who has complained to a government agency about habitability, exercised repair-and-deduct rights, or organized with other tenants. There is a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if the landlord acts within 180 days of the tenant's protected activity. The landlord bears the burden of proving a non-retaliatory motive.

V. Easements

An easement is a non-possessory right to use another's land for a specific purpose.

A. Types of Easements

Type Description Transferability
Appurtenant Benefits the holder in connection with their use of a specific parcel (the "dominant tenement") and burdens the "servient tenement." Runs with both the dominant and servient parcels automatically. Passes with the land even if not mentioned in the deed (unless BFP without notice cuts it off).
In Gross Benefits the holder personally, without connection to any particular parcel. There is no dominant tenement. Commercial easements in gross are transferable (e.g., utility easements). Personal easements in gross (e.g., right to fish) are generally not transferable.

Affirmative vs. Negative: An affirmative easement entitles the holder to do something on the servient land. A negative easement restricts what the servient landowner can do (traditionally limited to light, air, support, and water flow; modern trend adds scenic view). Negative easements can only be created by express grant.

B. Creation of Easements

Mnemonic: PINEPrescription, Implication, Necessity, Express grant/reservation — the four methods for creating an easement.

1. Express Grant or Reservation

2. Easement by Implication (Prior Existing Use)

3. Easement by Necessity

4. Easement by Prescription

Elements (same as adverse possession but no exclusivity requirement):
(1) Open and notorious use
(2) Adverse / hostile (without permission)
(3) Continuous for the statutory period
(4) Under some jurisdictions, the claim of right
CA Distinction—Prescriptive Easement. California requires a 5-year statutory period (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §318, §321). Unlike adverse possession, a prescriptive easement does not require payment of property taxes. Importantly, no prescriptive easement can be acquired against public land in California (Cal. Civ. Code §1007). The use must be open, notorious, continuous, hostile, and under a claim of right.

C. Scope of Easements

D. Termination of Easements

Mnemonic: END CRAMPEstoppel, Necessity ends, Destruction of servient tenement, Condemnation, Release, Abandonment, Merger, Prescription.

VI. Covenants Running with the Land & Equitable Servitudes

A. Real Covenants (Enforceable at Law—Damages)

A real covenant is a written promise regarding land use that runs with the land so that subsequent owners are bound or benefited. The remedy is money damages.

Elements for the Burden to Run (bind successors of the promisor)—"WITHIN":
Writing (Statute of Frauds)
Intent for the covenant to bind successors
Touch and concern the land
Horizontal privity (between the original parties—shared interest in the same land, e.g., grantor-grantee)
Implied: Vertical privity (between the original party and their successor—must be a succession of the entire estate, e.g., sale/devise, not just an easement)
Notice (actual, constructive/record, or inquiry)
Elements for the Benefit to Run (allow successors of the promisee to enforce):
Writing
Intent
Touch and concern
Vertical privity (relaxed—any successive interest suffices, including a lesser estate)
No horizontal privity required. No notice required.

B. Equitable Servitudes (Enforceable in Equity—Injunction)

An equitable servitude is a covenant enforced in equity (by injunction) regardless of whether it meets the technical requirements for a real covenant. No privity of estate is required.

Elements for the Burden to Run (Equitable Servitude)—"WITNE(ss)":
Writing (unless implied from a common scheme)
Intent for the promise to bind successors
Touch and concern the land
Notice (actual, constructive/record, or inquiry)
Equitable enforcement requested (injunction)

Implied Equitable Servitude / Reciprocal Negative Servitude

C. Defenses to Enforcement of Covenants / Servitudes

CA Distinction—Covenants. Cal. Civ. Code §1354 provides that CC&Rs (Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions) in a common interest development (HOA) are enforceable as equitable servitudes. Under Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village (1994), recorded CC&Rs are presumptively valid and enforceable unless they are wholly arbitrary, violate fundamental public policy, or impose a burden substantially outweighing the benefit to the community. This is a deferential standard favoring enforcement.

VII. Profits, Licenses, and Fixtures

A. Profits

B. Licenses

C. Fixtures

VIII. Adverse Possession

Elements of Adverse Possession (OCEAN):
Open and notorious — visible, such that a reasonable owner would discover it
Continuous — for the statutory period (consistent with the type of property; seasonal use of a summer home suffices)
Exclusive — not shared with the true owner or the general public
Actual — physical possession and use of the land (constructive adverse possession may extend to the entire area described in color of title)
Non-permissive (Hostile / Adverse) — without the true owner's permission
Mnemonic: OCEANOpen and notorious, Continuous, Exclusive, Actual, Non-permissive.

Additional Rules

CA Distinction—Adverse Possession. California requires the standard OCEAN elements plus:
(1) The statutory period is 5 years (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §318, §325).
(2) The adverse possessor must have paid all property taxes on the land for the entire 5-year period (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §325). This is a significant additional requirement not found in most other jurisdictions.
(3) Claim of right or color of title is required.
(4) No adverse possession against state or local government land (Cal. Civ. Code §1007).

IX. Conveyancing (Land Sale Transactions)

A. The Land Sale Contract

1. Statute of Frauds

2. Marketable Title

Rule: Every land sale contract contains an implied covenant of marketable title. The seller must deliver title that is free from reasonable doubt—i.e., free from encumbrances, defects, and the reasonable threat of litigation. Marketable title need only exist at the time of closing, not before.

What Makes Title Unmarketable:

3. Equitable Conversion

Rule: Once a valid land sale contract is executed, equity treats the buyer as the equitable owner of the real property, and the seller as the holder of personal property (the right to the purchase price). If either party dies before closing, the interest passes accordingly (real property to buyer's devisees/heirs; personal property right to seller's devisees/heirs).
CA Distinction—Risk of Loss. California follows the Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act (Cal. Civ. Code §1662). Risk of loss from material destruction remains with the seller until either legal title or possession is transferred to the buyer. If the property is materially destroyed before closing, the buyer may rescind and recover any payments made.

4. Duty to Disclose Defects

CA Distinction—Disclosure. California imposes broad statutory disclosure obligations on residential sellers. Cal. Civ. Code §1102–1102.17 requires sellers to complete a Transfer Disclosure Statement (TDS) revealing all known material facts affecting the property's value or desirability. Failure to disclose gives the buyer a cause of action for damages or rescission. Brokers also have an independent duty to inspect and disclose (Easton v. Strassburger).

B. The Deed

1. Requirements for a Valid Deed

Mnemonic: WOLDSWriting, Of a grantor with capacity, Legal description of the property, Delivery with intent to transfer, Signed by the grantor. (Note: no consideration is required for a valid deed.)

Special Delivery Issues

2. Types of Deeds

Deed Type Covenants of Title Protection
General Warranty Deed All six covenants of title (present: seisin, right to convey, against encumbrances; future: quiet enjoyment, warranty, further assurances) Maximum protection; grantor warrants against all defects, including those arising before grantor took title
Special Warranty Deed Same six covenants, but limited to defects arising during the grantor's ownership Grantor warrants only against defects created by or through the grantor
Quitclaim Deed None No warranties at all; transfers whatever interest the grantor has, if any. Often used between family members or to clear title defects.
Grant Deed (CA) Implied covenants: (1) grantor has not previously conveyed the same estate; (2) the estate is free from encumbrances made by the grantor The standard deed in California; provides limited implied warranties under Cal. Civ. Code §1113
CA Distinction—Grant Deed. California's standard conveyance instrument is the grant deed (Cal. Civ. Code §1092, §1113). The word "grant" in a conveyance implies two covenants: (1) the grantor has not previously conveyed the same estate; and (2) the estate is free from encumbrances done, made, or suffered by the grantor. Unlike a general warranty deed, the grant deed does not warrant against defects created by prior owners.

C. The Recording System

1. Purpose and Function

The recording system protects subsequent purchasers by providing constructive notice of prior conveyances. Recording is not required for a deed to be valid between the parties, but failure to record leaves the grantee vulnerable to subsequent purchasers.

2. Types of Recording Statutes

Type Rule Key Language
Race First to record wins, regardless of notice. "No conveyance shall be valid against a subsequent purchaser who first records."
Notice A subsequent BFP (without notice) prevails over a prior unrecorded interest, even if the BFP does not record first. "No conveyance shall be valid against a subsequent purchaser without notice."
Race-Notice A subsequent BFP prevails only if they: (1) had no notice at the time of purchase AND (2) recorded first. "No conveyance shall be valid against a subsequent purchaser who without notice first records."
CA Distinction—Race-Notice Jurisdiction. California follows a race-notice recording statute. Cal. Civ. Code §1214: "Every conveyance of real property… is void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee of the same property, or any part thereof, in good faith and for a valuable consideration, whose conveyance is first duly recorded." A subsequent purchaser must: (1) pay value, (2) act in good faith (without notice), and (3) record first.

3. Types of Notice

4. Chain of Title Issues

5. Who Is Protected?

X. Mortgages

A. Nature and Creation

B. Transfer of Mortgaged Property

C. Transfer of the Mortgage (by the Lender)

D. Priorities

General Rule: Priority among mortgages is determined by the recording acts. First in time to record (in a race or race-notice jurisdiction) prevails, provided the holder qualifies as a BFP where required.

E. Foreclosure

CA Distinction—Anti-Deficiency Protections. California has robust anti-deficiency protections:
(1) Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §580b: No deficiency judgment on a purchase money mortgage (whether seller-financed or lender-financed for a dwelling of 1–4 units).
(2) Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §580d: No deficiency judgment after a non-judicial foreclosure (power of sale).
(3) One-Action Rule (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §726): A secured creditor must foreclose on the security before pursuing the debtor personally; there can be only one action for recovery of a debt secured by real property.
(4) If the lender judicially forecloses, any deficiency is limited to the difference between the debt and the property's fair market value at the time of sale (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §580a).

F. Redemption

Type When How
Equity of Redemption Any time before the foreclosure sale Mortgagor pays the full outstanding debt (plus interest and costs) to redeem the property. Cannot be waived in the mortgage (clogging the equity of redemption is prohibited).
Statutory Redemption For a statutory period after the foreclosure sale (varies by state; not all states have this) Mortgagor (and sometimes junior lienholders) may redeem by paying the foreclosure sale price.
CA Distinction—Redemption. California provides a right of statutory redemption after judicial foreclosure for a period of 3 months (if the sale proceeds satisfy the debt) or up to 1 year (if a deficiency remains). However, there is no statutory redemption after a non-judicial foreclosure (power of sale) under a deed of trust. The equity of redemption exists up until the sale in all cases.

XI. Water Rights and Support Rights

A. Water Rights

1. Riparian Rights (Eastern States)

2. Prior Appropriation (Western States)

CA Distinction—Water Rights. California uses a hybrid system combining elements of both riparian rights and prior appropriation. Riparian rights attach to land bordering natural watercourses, but these rights are subject to the doctrine of reasonable and beneficial use (Cal. Const. Art. X, §2). The State Water Resources Control Board administers appropriative rights through a permit system. In times of shortage, riparian rights are generally superior to appropriative rights, but all uses must be reasonable and beneficial.

3. Groundwater (Percolating Water)

4. Surface Water (Runoff)

B. Support Rights

1. Lateral Support

2. Subjacent Support

XII. Zoning and Land Use Regulation

Takings (Fifth Amendment). Government regulation that goes "too far" may constitute a taking requiring just compensation. Two categories: (1) Per se taking—permanent physical invasion (Loretto) or regulation that eliminates all economically beneficial use (Lucas); (2) Regulatory taking—balancing test considering economic impact, investment-backed expectations, and character of the government action (Penn Central). Exactions (conditions imposed on development permits) must have an essential nexus (Nollan) and rough proportionality (Dolan) to the impact of the proposed development.

XIII. Additional California-Specific Rules

Comprehensive CA Summary. The following rules are distinctive California features frequently tested on the essay portion.

Common Essay Patterns

Pattern Recognition. Real Property essays on the California Bar tend to fall into recurring patterns. Recognizing the pattern early lets you organize your answer efficiently.
Pattern 1: The Land Sale Transaction Gone Wrong

Typical Fact Pattern: A sells property to B under a land sale contract. Issues arise before or after closing: title defects, undisclosed easements, recording problems, a third party claims an interest, a mortgage priority dispute.

Key Issues to Address:

  • Statute of Frauds (writing, part performance)
  • Marketable title (encumbrances, zoning violations)
  • Equitable conversion and risk of loss
  • Deed validity (WOLDS), type of deed, covenants of title
  • Recording act (race-notice in CA): who qualifies as a BFP?
  • Shelter rule, wild deeds, chain of title problems
  • Mortgage priority (PMM super-priority)
  • CA: Grant deed covenants, Transfer Disclosure Statement, race-notice statute
Pattern 2: Neighbors in Conflict (Easements, Covenants, Land Use)

Typical Fact Pattern: Adjacent property owners dispute over use of land: one claims an easement (by prescription, necessity, or implication), the other asserts a covenant violation, and there may be an adverse possession claim or a zoning issue.

Key Issues to Address:

  • Easement creation (PINE: prescription, implication, necessity, express)
  • Prescriptive easement elements vs. adverse possession (no exclusivity needed; CA: no tax payment for prescriptive easement)
  • Scope and termination of easements (END CRAMP)
  • Real covenants vs. equitable servitudes: which elements are met?
  • Implied reciprocal servitude (common scheme)
  • Defenses: changed conditions, unclean hands, laches
  • Zoning: nonconforming use, variance, takings
  • CA: 5-year statutory period, no prescriptive rights against public land
Pattern 3: Landlord-Tenant Dispute

Typical Fact Pattern: A tenant complains about conditions in a rental unit, withholds rent, or abandons the premises. The landlord retaliates or seeks to evict. There may be an assignment or sublease complication.

Key Issues to Address:

  • Type of tenancy (years, periodic, at will, sufferance)
  • Implied warranty of habitability (residential only, cannot be waived)
  • Constructive eviction (SING)
  • Tenant remedies: repair and deduct, rent withholding, damages
  • Assignment vs. sublease: privity of estate vs. privity of contract
  • Landlord's duty to mitigate upon abandonment
  • Retaliatory eviction
  • CA: IWH statute, repair and deduct (up to 1 month, 2x/year), 180-day retaliation presumption, AB 1482 rent caps and just cause, 30/60-day notice termination
Pattern 4: Estates and Future Interests / RAP

Typical Fact Pattern: A will or trust creates a series of estates and future interests in land. You must classify each interest, determine whether RAP applies, and analyze who takes the property when certain events occur or fail to occur.

Key Issues to Address:

  • Classify each present estate (fee simple, defeasible fee, life estate)
  • Classify each future interest (reversion, remainder, executory interest)
  • Distinguish vested vs. contingent remainders
  • Apply RAP to contingent remainders and executory interests
  • Watch for classic RAP traps: unborn widow, fertile octogenarian, slothful executor
  • Class gifts: all-or-nothing rule, rule of convenience
  • CA: USRAP 90-year wait-and-see, cy pres reformation, abolished destructibility/Shelley's Case/Worthier Title, no fertility presumption after 65
Pattern 5: Concurrent Ownership and Mortgage Foreclosure

Typical Fact Pattern: Co-owners (joint tenants or tenants in common) disagree about the property. One co-owner mortgages their interest or sells to a third party. Issues of severance, partition, and mortgage foreclosure priority arise.

Key Issues to Address:

  • Type of concurrent estate (joint tenancy vs. tenancy in common)
  • Four unities (T-TIP) for joint tenancy
  • Severance by conveyance, mortgage (lien theory vs. title theory), or lease
  • Partition: in kind vs. by sale
  • Rights between co-tenants: contribution for taxes/mortgage, accounting for rents, ouster
  • Mortgage: creation, transfer, priority (recording acts), foreclosure
  • CA: No straw person needed, mortgage does not sever (lien theory), lease does not sever (Tenhet), anti-deficiency protections, non-judicial foreclosure procedures, community property overlay

Issue-Spotting Checklist

Exam Tips

1. Always State Both Rules. On the California essay, state the common-law rule first, then separately state the California rule. Even if they reach the same result, acknowledging both earns maximum points.
2. Classify Before You Analyze. For estates and future interests, always classify each interest before applying RAP or any other rule. Graders expect precise terminology: "B has a contingent remainder in fee simple absolute" is much better than "B might get the property."
3. Watch for Crossover Issues. Real property frequently crosses over with: (a) Community Property (property acquired during marriage); (b) Wills & Trusts (devises creating future interests); (c) Remedies (specific performance of land sale contracts, injunctions for covenant violations); (d) Constitutional Law (takings, due process in zoning).
4. Recording Act Analysis. When multiple parties claim the same property: (a) Identify the recording statute type (CA = race-notice); (b) Determine the order of conveyances and recordings on a timeline; (c) Ask: did the subsequent purchaser pay value, act without notice, and record first?
5. Organize by Transaction. For conveyancing essays, follow the chronological sequence: (1) contract formation (SOF, marketable title); (2) executory period (equitable conversion, risk of loss); (3) closing (deed validity, delivery, covenants of title); (4) post-closing (recording, title disputes, mortgage priority).
6. Do Not Confuse Terminology. "Possibility of reverter" is not the same as "right of entry." "Assignment" is not the same as "sublease." "Real covenant" is not the same as "equitable servitude." Precise use of terms is critical.

Mnemonics Summary

Mnemonic Stands For Topic
OCEAN Open & notorious, Continuous, Exclusive, Actual, Non-permissive Adverse Possession elements
T-TIP Time, Title, Interest, Possession Four unities for Joint Tenancy
SING Substantial interference, It's landlord's fault, Notice given, Goodbye (vacate) Constructive Eviction
PINE Prescription, Implication, Necessity, Express Easement Creation methods
END CRAMP Estoppel, Necessity ends, Destruction, Condemnation, Release, Abandonment, Merger, Prescription Easement Termination methods
WOLDS Writing, Of a grantor (capacity), Legal description, Delivery, Signed Valid Deed requirements
WITHIN Writing, Intent, Touch & concern, Horizontal privity, (Implied: Vertical privity), Notice Real Covenant—Burden Running

Key Distinctions

Concept A Concept B Key Difference
Fee Simple Determinable Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent FSD ends automatically; FSSCS requires the grantor to exercise the right of entry. Language matters: "so long as" = FSD; "but if / provided that" = FSSCS.
Vested Remainder Contingent Remainder Vested: created in an ascertained person with no condition precedent. Contingent: unascertained person or subject to a condition precedent. RAP applies only to contingent remainders.
Remainder Executory Interest A remainder follows the natural expiration of the prior estate (patient). An executory interest divests (cuts short) a prior interest (impatient).
Joint Tenancy Tenancy in Common JT has right of survivorship and requires four unities. TIC has no survivorship right and requires only unity of possession. TIC is the default.
Assignment Sublease Assignment = entire remaining term transferred (assignee in privity of estate with landlord). Sublease = less than the entire term (sublessee NOT in privity with landlord).
Real Covenant Equitable Servitude Real covenant: remedy is damages; requires privity. Equitable servitude: remedy is injunction; no privity required.
Easement License Easement is an interest in land (irrevocable, runs with land). License is a personal privilege (revocable, does not run).
Easement by Implication Easement by Necessity Implication requires prior existing use, apparent and continuous, and reasonable necessity. Necessity requires strict necessity (landlocked) but no prior use. Necessity lasts only while the necessity exists.
Adverse Possession Prescriptive Easement AP: must be exclusive, results in ownership. Prescriptive easement: need not be exclusive, results only in a right to use. In CA: AP requires tax payment; prescriptive easement does not.
Mortgage "Subject To" Mortgage "Assuming" "Subject to": buyer not personally liable (no deficiency judgment against buyer). "Assuming": buyer becomes personally liable; original mortgagor becomes surety.
Judicial Foreclosure Non-Judicial Foreclosure Judicial: court-supervised, deficiency judgment possible (subject to anti-deficiency statutes), statutory redemption available. Non-judicial: power of sale, faster, no deficiency in CA, no statutory redemption in CA.
General Warranty Deed Grant Deed (CA) General warranty: six covenants, warrants against all defects. Grant deed: two implied covenants only (no prior conveyance, no encumbrances by grantor). Grant deed is the CA standard.
Common-Law RAP CA USRAP Common law: void ab initio if any possibility of remote vesting. CA USRAP: valid if vests within common-law period OR within 90 years (wait and see); court may reform if necessary.